This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
About Us | Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Join now
Dynamics of exclusion
Leading Libraries Banner


Leading Libraries Series: Leading for Inclusion

Challenges to inclusive practice

 

Dynamics of exclusion: formation of in-groups and out-groups

In-groups hold power and tend to follow mainstream norms and behaviours. If as a leader you keep close and relate more to people who are like you, people from different backgrounds will be excluded from relationships and opportunities that would benefit us all. This also means that power stays with mainstream groups, and a diverse range of thinking and perspectives go un-utilised, having a negative impact on innovation, performance and morale.

 

How in-group beliefs create prejudice

In 1968, Jane Elliot an American diversity educator and teacher, devised a controversial racism experiment with school children – the brown eyes and blue eyes experiment.

Within a school class she created an in-group (children with brown eyes) and an out-group (children with blue eyes). Children in the in-group were given more respect, privilege and praise.

Quite quickly this group of children had raised self-esteem and academically outperformed their counterparts in the out-group, many of which were previously high performers in the class.

Through this experiment, Elliot showed not only the power of privilege and of being part of the mainstream in-group, but also how quickly we can learn prejudice. She related this back to racism and racial inequalities and the detrimental impact these are having on the outcomes and opportunities available to people of colour.

The principles of this experiment can be applied to other minority characteristics and groups. Although this experiment was carried out in 1968, and the ethics of her practice have been questioned, the learning is still relevant today.

For a closer look at Elliot’s work, you can watch the video A Class divided.

 

Understanding our own in-groups and out-groups

We respond differently to people who are in our in-groups and out-groups. The diagrams show some of the differences between how we feel and behave.

How we feel towards people in our in-group and out-group

n a box on the left is the title 'In-group' underneath are the words 'Trust worthiness', 'Self-esteem' and 'Security'. In a box on the right is the title 'Out-group underneath are the words 'Distrust', 'Anxiety', 'Unfamiliarity' and 'Hostility' Between the two boxes is a grey circle containing the word 'BIAS

 

How we behave towards people in our in-group and out-group

In a box on the left is the title 'In-group' underneath is listed 'Individuals', 'Difference accepted', 'Positive information remembered', 'Recall contributions', 'Work hard for in-group members' and 'Prepared to make sacrifices. In a box on the right is the title 'Out-group underneath is listed 'Homogenous', 'Difference is minimised', 'Negative information remembered', 'Forget contributions', 'Don't put in the effort' and 'Don't offer support'. Between the two boxes is a grey circle containing the word 'BIAS'

 

Individual reflection

Think about your 5 closest friends and your 5 closest colleagues.

  • How diverse is this group?
  • What does this tell you about your in-group preferences?
  • At work, who might be benefiting or missing out because of your in-group preferences?
  • What does this tell you about your out-group preferences?
  • What could you do to extend your in-group? What would be the benefit of this?

 

Continue to: The impact of exclusion

 


Leading for Libraries Sets

Introduction

Introducing the Leading Libraries series. It covers the findings from the C21st Public Servant research, the origins of the four 'Leading for' capabilities and explains how to use the materials.



INTRODUCTION

Leading for Resilience

This set introduces you to resilience and why it is important for leaders. It covers emotional resilience; mental resilience; relationship resilience and social resilience.



LEADING FOR RESILIENCE

Leading for Dialogue

It covers the key concepts of dialogue and why it is important for leaders, listening and inquiry skills, an introduction to 'conversational moves' and how to create a space for dialogue.



LEADING FOR DIALOGUE

Leading for Inclusion

Emphasising the need for inclusive practice in our services and communities. It covers the foundations of inclusion, barriers to inclusion, power and privilege and allyship skills.



LEADING FOR INCLUSION

Leading for Innovation

Building creativity and design skills for leaders. It covers the innovation cycle, diagnosis and perspective shifting skills, creative idea generation and safe-to-fail experimentation.



LEADING FOR INNOVATION