This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
About Us | Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Join now
Leading for dialogue
Leading Libraries Banner


Leading Libraries Series: Leading for Dialogue

Leading through dialogue

 

Leading for dialogue

This module is an introduction to dialogue and its importance in an organisational setting. It will help you understand why dialogue is important in leadership, how it differs from other forms of conversation and introduce you to the core skill of inquiry.

Watch this 27 minute video

 

21st century leadership the heroic model

More traditional models of leadership emphasise the role of the leader in :

  • Direction setting
  • Vision creation
  • Culture design

In keeping with this model, early in our managerial careers, we learn the skills of Advocacy – the ability to put a point of view, state our opinion, communicate our recommendations and decisions.

 

21st century leadership - The dialogic model

As we develop further in our leadership, Inquiry skills come to the fore, as we recognise we cannot:

  • see all angles on every situation
  • know what everyone else really thinks and feels
  • have all the answers!

This is particularly true when:

  • we are exploring complex issues where no one person can hold all the answers
  • we want to draw on diverse perspectives for creativity or innovation
  • we are working with users and citizens and want to fully understand their needs and assets.

 

New public service roles emphasise a more relational approach

As you will remember from the module 'An introduction to the capabilities', we referred to the research on the qualities of the 21st century leader of public service. Many of the new roles identified have a strong relational emphasis which brings the skills of dialogue and personal connection to the fore.

 

The municipal entrepreneur

The municipal entrepreneur pulls together organisations, civic groups and citizens to create new services and innovate in existing ones.

Dialogue approaches support this role by helping us ensure that all the relevant perspectives are taken into account and by making opportunities for creative collaboration.

 

The navigator

The navigator supports citizens and service users by helping them to find their way around the complex public and third sector systems so that they can access the resources and services they need.

The navigator uses their deep listening skills to really 'stand in the shoes' of the individual they are supporting so they can gain an understanding of what is required and how that person might like to be assisted.

 

The storyteller

The storyteller works with colleagues to improve services and the experiences of users by sharing examples about real situations and by creating narratives about how things could be done differently.

They use stories and illustrations to make sure that learning is based in real life rather than organisational beliefs about how things work.

The storyteller has their 'ear to the ground' to listen for what matters and uses their creative speaking skills to craft new ideas.

 

The networker

The networker suggests and facilitates new connections between colleagues, volunteers and users so that people can learn together and collaborate on the things that matter to them.

The networker will have strong facilitation skills and will know how to bring people together by 'holding spaces' for their dialogue.

 

Dialogue as a leadership capability

Leading for Dialogue helps us and others to:


Our brains are beautifully designed for meaning-making, observing, categorising, and concluding.

Our minds filter information on the basis of what is familiar, unfamiliar, attractive or dangerous. However, we can be prone to generalisations.

The opportunity in dialogue is to notice how we 'make meaning', so that we can better articulate our ideas to others, whilst also being sensitive to the limitations of our meaning-making.

We can learn from others through deep listening. This helps us to shift perceptions and change position, to expand what we see and perceive as ‘truth’, get into the shoes of others, and see the wider system of which we are a part.

Ultimately deep dialogue enables us to generate engagement towards a shared vision by taking into account the multiple parts, positions, and possibilities beyond our own.

 

What do we mean by 'dialogue'? From 'conversation' to 'dialogue'

The term 'dialogue' comes from Greek and signifies a 'flow of meaning'.

The essence of dialogue is an inquiry that surfaces ideas, perceptions, and understanding that people do not already have. This is not the norm. In our organisations, we typically try to come to important conversations well prepared. A hallmark of success for many of us is that there are “no surprises” in our meetings. Yet this is the antithesis of dialogue.

You have a dialogue when you explore the uncertainties and questions that no one has answers to. In this way you begin to think together—not simply report out old thoughts. In dialogue, people learn to use the energy of their differences to enhance their collective wisdom.

Two trees beside each other that are shaped like faces

 

MIT Senior Lecturer and dialogue expert, William Isaacs introduced the leadership world to the importance of dialogue in his book ‘Dialogue – The Art of Thinking Together’. You can read more about his ideas about the role of the leader in creating a space for dialogue there. A brief article about his ideas is available via the MIT Newsletter Spectrum – The Art of Dialogue. If you are interested in the idea of dialogue as a leadership practice on the global stage, you may like this brief video excerpt – Conversations that change the world.

In the last 10 years, the consultant and theorist, Otto Scharmer, has moved the field on by linking dialogue with the capacity to be open to new ways of seeing and thinking about the world. In terms of leadership, this raises new possibilities for collective change management and innovation. By having an open ‘mind’, ‘heart’ and ‘will’, we are able to work systemically and imaginatively, with an expanded view of a situation, and therefore an expanded capacity to generate new ideas and approaches [ Theory U, Scharmer, C. Otto(2007)].

Scharmer's Presencing Institute is now one of the leading lights on dialogue globally, offering a huge range of resources and trainings on the subject. If you want to delve more deeply into this fascinating subject, you can access some of their free and excellent tools for dialogue on the Scharmers Presencing Institute site.

 

Towards dialogue

‘Dialogue’ is not just a different word for ‘conversation’ – there are many ways of conversing (as shown by the diagram below). Dialogue can be contrasted with “discussion,” a word whose roots mean “to break apart.” Discussions are conversations where people hold onto and defend their differences. The hope is that the clash of opinion will illuminate productive pathways for action and insight. Yet in practice, discussion often devolves into rigid debate, where people view one another as positions to agree with or refute, not as partners in a vital, living relationship. Such exchanges represent a series of one-way streets, and the end results are often not what people wish for but polarized arguments where people withhold vital information and shut down creative options.

We can choose to be in dialogue by choosing to suspend (rather than defend) our ideas and assumptions for the duration of the conversation and by genuinely inquiring into (and listening to!) the perspectives of the other people in the conversation.

A flow chart from left to right starts with ‘Conversation “to turn together”’ and leads to a ‘Fundamental choice point’. One arrow off the ‘Fundamental choice point’ box leads to ‘Suspend – Listening without resistance; dis-identify’ another arrow points from ‘Suspend’ to ‘Reflective Dialogue – Explores underlying causes, rules and assumptions to get to deeper questions and framing of problems’ this box then points to a final box containing ‘Generative Dialogue – Invents unprecedented possibilities and new insights, produces collective flow’. Back to ‘Fundamental choice point’ a second arrow leads to ‘Defend “to ward, protect from attack”’ next to which is a circle marking a ‘Fundamental choice point’, from ‘Defend’ one arrow points to ‘Skilled conversation – Analytic, uses hard data to get answers to problems; reasoning made explicit’ followed by another arrow and ‘Dialectic – Tension and synthesis of opposites’. From ‘Defend’ a second arrow points to ‘Controlled Discussion – Advocacy, competing: abstract verbal brawling; followed by another arrow and ‘Debate – Resolve by beating down’.

 

Towards dialogue: four stages

When groups or teams are developing their dialogue skills, they tend to pass through four distinct stages - and, of course, some groups or conversations get 'stuck' at a particular level! These stages are:

 

1. Politeness

This is when each person is simply 'downloaded' their own opinions and experience without listening effectively to others or trying to connect to their ideas. People in the conversation are 'polite' and aim to maintain harmony in the group - they are not trying to influence each other or allow themselves to be influenced.

2. Deliberation

At this point, people become more engaged in the conversation, trying to influence others and share their own ideas. This can be a skilful process, including some active listening and effective debate - however, the participants are more interested in putting their views across than in allowing the conversation to affect their perspective.

3. Inquiry

When a group reaches the stage of 'Inquiry', people are becoming genuinely interested in other people's experiences and the perspectives that can be brought to the conversation. The participants are listening more deeply to each other - trying to get a real understanding of how they feel about the issues and how the different views can be connected and brought together. They are also reflecting on their own feelings and opinions and are open to the possibility of change.

4. Flow

If a group is able to find a 'flow' in a conversation, this is when the conversation takes on 'a life of its own' beyond any individual's input. Participants are allowing the conversation to affect them, reflecting on their own perspectives, changing their viewpoints and even the way they feel about the issue. New ideas can emerge, new perspectives can develop and the whole group may experience a collective shift in understanding - even on issues which are difficult, conflictual or long standing.

 

In stages 2 and 3, participants are focusing more on the 'parts' - the individual viewpoints and ideas at play - trying to clarify and understand them in different ways. In stages 1 and 4 the focus is on the 'whole' but in very different ways. At stage 1, the group is trying to stay together by being considerate and formal, avoiding conflict and disturbance. At stage 4, the group is fully engaged with the conversation, noticing the shape of the discussion and the threads that are coming together - conflict and disagreement are not scary or personalised, they are just part of the process.

Image shows a quadrant with the horizontal line showing ‘Primacy of the whole on the left’ and ‘Primacy of the parts’ on the right. The vertical axis shows ‘self-reflective’ at the top and ‘Blaming & non-reflective’ at the bottom. In the bottom left quadrant is ‘I Politeness - (shared) monologues’, in the bottom right quadrant is ‘II Deliberation – Controlled discussion or skilful conversation’. The top right quadrant reads ‘III Inquiry – reflective dialogue’ and the top left quadrant reads ‘IV Flow – Generative dialogue’. There is an orange arrow showing the journey from ‘I Politeness’ to ‘II Deliberation’, then ‘III Inquiry and finally ‘IV Flow’.

 

Continue to: Starting with ourselves

 


Leading for Libraries Sets

Introduction

Introducing the Leading Libraries series. It covers the findings from the C21st Public Servant research, the origins of the four 'Leading for' capabilities and explains how to use the materials.



INTRODUCTION

Leading for Resilience

This set introduces you to resilience and why it is important for leaders. It covers emotional resilience; mental resilience; relationship resilience and social resilience.



LEADING FOR RESILIENCE

Leading for Dialogue

It covers the key concepts of dialogue and why it is important for leaders, listening and inquiry skills, an introduction to 'conversational moves' and how to create a space for dialogue.



LEADING FOR DIALOGUE

Leading for Inclusion

Emphasising the need for inclusive practice in our services and communities. It covers the foundations of inclusion, barriers to inclusion, power and privilege and allyship skills.



LEADING FOR INCLUSION

Leading for Innovation

Building creativity and design skills for leaders. It covers the innovation cycle, diagnosis and perspective shifting skills, creative idea generation and safe-to-fail experimentation.



LEADING FOR INNOVATION